{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":5,"sheets":["SLO1","SLO2","SLO3","POs","List"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":1,"external_links":2,"defined_names":7,"comments":3,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"SLO1","index":0,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[9,1,9,5],[17,1,17,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 1"]
["Students will be able to use the scientific method approach to evaluate data."]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","FAS 440 Research Methods in Bioscience"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Students will compose six case studies (CS). Case study #3 will be used to evaluate this learning outcome"]
["Evaluation Tool:","From the six case studies, CS#3 is used to evaluate this learning outcome using the \"Critical Thinking\" rubric. All aspects of the rubric are used as follows: Identifies and summarizes the problem/question at issue (10%).  Identifies and assesses the quality of supporting data/evidence (20%).  Identifies and considers the influence of the context on the issue (20%).  Demonstrates higher level thinking by interpreting the author’s meaning or the potential bias (20%).  Identifies and evaluates conclusions, implications, and consequences (30%).  "]
["Performance Target: ","At least 75% of all submitted CS#3 will be rated as \"Good\" on each aspect of the case study."]
["Results:","57% (8/14) of the CS#3 were rated as \"Good\"on Identifies and summarizes the problem/question at issue (10%).  57% (8/14) of the CS#3 were rated as \"Good\"on Identifies and assesses the quality of supporting data/evidence (20%).   57% (8/14) of the CS#3 were rated as \"Good\"on Identifies and considers the influence of the context on the issue (20%). 57% (8/14) of the CS#3 were rated as \"Good\"on Demonstrates higher level thinking by interpreting the author’s meaning or the potential bias (20%).  57% (8/14) of the CS#3 were rated as \"Good\"on Identifies and evaluates conclusions, implications, and consequences (30%)"]
["Use of Results:"," TARGET NOT MET. The program plans to continue to emphasize the importance of submitting Case Study #3. This measure will be used in next year's plans. "]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","FAS 440 Research Methods in Bioscience"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","A final term manuscript will be developed by students from the information garnered from the six mini-projects"]
["Evaluation Tool:","The final paper is evaluated using  the \"Written Presentation (Research Paper)\" rubric. All aspects of the rubric were used as follows: Title (5%).  Abstract (10%).  Introduction (15%).  Materials and Methods (15%).  Results (20%).  Discussion (25%).  Literature Cited (10%)."]
["Performance Target: ","At least 75% of the final manuscripts will be rated as \"Good\" on each aspect of the final manuscript."]
["Results:","67% (6/9) of the final manuscripts were rated as \"Good\" on Title (5%).  67% (6/9) of the final manuscripts were rated as \"Good\" on Abstract (10%).  67% (6/9) of the final manuscripts were rated as \"Good\" on Introduction (15%). 67% (6/9) of the final manuscripts were rated as \"Good\" on Materials and Methods (15%).  67% (6/9) of the final manuscripts were rated as \"Good\" on Results (20%). 67% (6/9) of the final manuscripts were rated as \"Good\" on Discussion (25%).  67% (6/9) of the final manuscripts were rated as \"Good\" onLiterature Cited (10%)."]
["Use of Results:","TARGET NOT MET. Review (for a second time) the previously incorporated lecture on “how to write a scientific paper” close to the final paper due date. Will remind students about consequences of plagiarism and on how to better write materials and methods and discussion. This measure will be used in next year's plans."]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"SLO2","index":1,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5],[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 2"]
["Students will be able to explain and simulate the various steps involved in Mitosis and Meiosis"]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","  Animal Anatomy and Physiology (FAS 460)"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","A final term project will be developed by students from the information garnered from class and various on-line resources. "]
["Evaluation Tool:","The final term project is evaluated with the \"Critical Thinking\" rubric. All aspects of the rubric are used as follows: Identifies and summarizes the problem/question at issue (10%).  Identifies and assesses the quality of supporting data/evidence (20%).  Identifies and considers the influence of the context on the issue (20%).  Demonstrates higher level thinking by interpreting the author’s meaning or the potential bias (20%).  Identifies and evaluates conclusions, implications, and consequences (30%).  "]
["Performance Target: ","At least 75% of all submitted term projects will be rated as \"Good\" on each aspect of the term project. "]
["Results:","100% (9/9) of the term projects were rated as \"Good\" on Identifies and summarizes the problem/question at issue (10%). 100% (9/9) of the term projects were rated as \"Good\" on Identifies and assesses the quality of supporting data/evidence (20%).  100% (9/9) of the term projects were rated as \"Good\" on Identifies and considers the influence of the context on the issue (20%).  100% (9/9) of the term projects were rated as \"Good\" on Demonstrates higher level thinking by interpreting the author’s meaning or the potential bias (20%). 100% (9/9) of the term projects were rated as \"Good\" on Identifies and evaluates conclusions, implications, and consequences (30%).  "]
["Use of Results:","This project was very successful. The program plans to continue using the Mitosis and Meiosis simulation project in its assessment reports because it is a critical topic to master in this program. "]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","  Animal Anatomy and Physiology (FAS 460)"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:"," Students will complete one homework associated with this outcome"]
["Evaluation Tool:","The homework is evaluated using the \"Written Report (topical)\" rubric.  All aspects of the rubric are used as follows: Knowledge (20%).  Topic focus (10%).  Depth of discussion (20%).  Cohesiveness (20%).  Spelling and grammar (15%).  Sources (15%)."]
["Performance Target: ","At least 70% of submitted homeworks will be rated as \"Good\" on each aspect of the homework"]
["Results:","5/11 (45%) of the homeworks scored \"Good\" on Knowledge (20%). 5/11 (45%) of the homeworks scored \"Good\" on Topic focus (10%). 5/11 (45%) of the homeworks scored \"Good\" on Depth of discussion (20%). 5/11 (45%) of the homeworks scored \"Good\" on Cohesiveness (20%). 5/11 (45%) of the homeworks scored \"Good\" on Spelling and grammar (15%). 5/11 (45%) of the homeworks scored \"Good\" on Sources (15%)."]
["Use of Results:"," TARGET NOT MET. The programs plans to continue to emphasize the importance of submitting homework on time. This measure will be used in next year's plans."]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"SLO3","index":2,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5],[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 1"]
["Students will be able to analyze and summarize data obtained from the genetic selection of various traits using a computer simulation program"]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","FAS 353 Animal Breeding and Genetics"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","A final term manuscript will be developed by students from the information obtained using the simulation program after 12 generations of genetic selection."]
["Evaluation Tool:","The final paper is evaluated using  the \"Written Presentation (Research Paper)\" rubric. All aspects of the rubric are used as follows: Title (5%).  Abstract (10%).  Introduction (15%).  Materials and Methods (15%).  Results (20%).  Discussion (25%).  Literature Cited (10%)."]
["Performance Target: ","At least 75% of all submitted term papers will be rated as \"Good\" on each aspect of the term paper. "]
["Results:","58%  (7/12) of the term papers were rated as \"Good\" on Title (5%). 58%  (7/12) of the term papers were rated as \"Good\" on Abstract (10%). 58%  (7/12) of the term papers were rated as \"Good\" on Introduction (15%). 58%  (7/12) of the term papers were rated as \"Good\" on Materials and Methods (15%). 58%  (7/12) of the term papers were rated as \"Good\" on Results (20%). 58%  (7/12) of the term papers were rated as \"Good\" on Discussion (25%).  58%  (7/12) of the term papers were rated as \"Good\" on Literature Cited (10%)."]
["Use of Results:"," TARGET NOT MET.  A lecture on “how to write a scientific paper.” was incorporated in this course. The program plans to evaluate this measure again in next year's plans"]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","FAS 353 Animal Breeding and Genetics"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:"," Students will complete one homework associated with this outcome"]
["Evaluation Tool:","The homework is evaluated with the \"Critical Thinking\" rubric.  All aspects of the rubric are used as follows: Identifies and summarizes the problem/question at issue (10%).  Identifies and assesses the quality of supporting data/evidence (20%).  Identifies and considers the influence of the context on the issue (20%).  Demonstrates higher level thinking by interpreting the author’s meaning or the potential bias (20%).  Identifies and evaluates conclusions, implications, and consequences (30%).  "]
["Performance Target: ","At least 70% of homeworks will be rated as \"Good\" by the rubric on each aspect of the homework."]
["Results:","50% (6/12) of the homeworks were rated as \"Good\" on Identifies and summarizes the problem/question at issue (10%). 50% (6/12) of the homeworks were rated as \"Good\" on Identifies and assesses the quality of supporting data/evidence (20%). 50% (6/12) of the homeworks were rated as \"Good\" on  Identifies and considers the influence of the context on the issue (20%). 50% (6/12) of the homeworks were rated as \"Good\" on  Demonstrates higher level thinking by interpreting the author’s meaning or the potential bias (20%). 50% (6/12) of the homeworks were rated as \"Good\" on  Identifies and evaluates conclusions, implications, and consequences (30%).  "]
["Use of Results:","TARGET NOT MET. A strong positive correlation between attendance and homework performance was observed.  Thus, the importance of attending class will be emphasized as the syllabus is reviewed more than once during the semester. The program plans to evaluate this measure again in next year's plans. "]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"POs","index":3,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,5],[6,0,6,5],[11,1,11,5],[10,1,10,5],[9,1,9,5],[8,1,8,5],[5,1,5,5],[4,1,4,5],[3,1,3,5],[2,1,2,5],[1,0,1,5],[7,0,7,5]]}
["Program Outcome 1"]
["To recruit undergraduate students in Animal Bio-Health Sciences."]
["Assessment Measure:","Recruitment data"]
["Assessment Target:","The Program plans to recruit a minimum of 20 freshman each fall."]
["Assessment Results:"," A total of 23 freshman entered the Program in the Fall of 2018."]
["Use of Results:","Yes, the Program met the target for recruitment in ABHS.  The program plans to continue the efforts to meet the target each fall. The program plans to use this measure again because it is an important initiative in the growth of the program and the university. "]
["Program Outcome 2"]
["To retain undergraduate students majoring in ABHS."]
["Assessment Measure:","Retention data. "]
["Assessment Target:","Fall enrollment was 100 students. The target is to retain at least 75 percent of the 100 ABHS students or 75 students by spring 2019."]
["Assessment Results:","The Program retained  89 percent of the 100 ABHS (34 freshman, 25 sophomores, 22 juniors and 8 seniors for a total of 89 students in Spring 2019).  Advisees met with advisers more than once each semester (registration, course advisement, career counseling, internship and scholarship information)."]
["Use of Results:","Yes, the Program met the target as the Fall 2018 enrollment was 100 students with 89 in the Spring of 2019.  This is a retention of 89%.  The Program will continue to  have constant interaction with advisees in addition to frequent contact with the Office of Student. The program plans to use this measure again because it is an important initiative in the growth of the program and the university. "]

{"sheet":"List","index":4,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":3,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["Face-to-Face",null,"Yes"]
["Online",null,"No"]
["Off campus"]