{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":5,"sheets":["SLO1","SLO2","SLO3","POs","List"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":1,"external_links":0,"defined_names":5,"comments":3,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"SLO1","index":0,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":18,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5],[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 1"]
["Students/graduates in the FCS program will examine the history and evolution of FCS. Students will also demonstrate a thorough understanding of body of knowledge and its role in daily life."]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","FCS 101 Intro to the Profession"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Final Exam Part A (Questions 1-20= 0-100 points) and Part B (Question 21 worth 16 points). "]
["Evaluation Tool:","Final Exam Key - Evaluated on History of FCS/Part A (Questions 1-20= 0-100 points) and Body of Knowledge/Part B (Question 21 worth 16 points). "]
["Performance Target: ","0 % of the submitted final exams will score 70% (70 points) or more Part A-History of FCS and 70% (11 points) or more on Part B-Body of Knowledge. "]
["Results:","Not sure since the subject was brand new or the students were new to the program, the results on this Exam did not showcase the student learning. On Topic A History of FCS, only 1 out of 40 (3%) of the exam earned 70% or more points (> 70 points out of 100 points). On Topic B Body of Knowledge questions, only 5 out of 40 (13%) of the exams scored 70% or more (> 11 points out of 16 points). These results called for a serious reflections and need to be addressed immediately, since overall, only one Exam scored above 70% among the 40 students enrolled in this section. "]
["Use of Results:","(1) The Instructor will conduct a review during the last 10 minutes of each class given the course is only offered once a well. (2) The Instructor will provide extra study guides.  (3) The Instructor will encourage study groups."]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","FCS 420 Senior Seminar"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Capstone Assessment"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Capstone Assessment Key  - Topic A History of FCS (Items 1,3,4,8,9,16,19, 20,24,26, & 31); Topic B Impact of Industrial Ren. On Voc. Trng.. And Changing Fam  Roles (Items 1,4,5,7,11,19,27, & 29); Topic C Effects of Land-Grant Acts on Dev. of FCS (Items 13 & 17)."]
["Performance Target: ","70% of the submitted capstone assessments will score a grade of 70% (70 points) or more on Topics A (11 points or more) ;  Topic B (6 points or more); Part C (1 point or more)."]
["Results:","Overall, the Capstone Assessments earned a decent grade on Topics A & B, but lacked on Topic C (Land-Grant Acts on Dev of FCS). On Topic A (History of FCS), 11 out of 16 (69%) Assessments scored 70% or more points (> 8 out of 11 points); on the Topic B (Impact of the Industrial Rev. on Voc. Trng.. and Changing Roles of Fam. Structure), 12 out 16 (75%) Assessments scored 70% or more (> 6 out of 8 points). Finally, on the Topic C, only 4 out of 16 (25%) assessments scored 70% or more (>1.5 points or more out of 2 points)."]
["Use of Results:","(1) More clarity will be offered on the assessment questions that would be included in the Capstone assignment. (2) PowerPoints will be reviewed for their accuracy and completeness before students can present them to the class.(3) After all the class presentations, a random check will be conducted to ensure all the students obtained/secured all the answers for all the questions."]

{"sheet":"SLO2","index":1,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":18,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5],[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 2 "]
["Students will demonstrate knowledge and understanding of elements and principles of art and their applications in daily life. Students will also comprehend the procedures of dietary analysis and deriving subsequent conclusions."]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","AMD 104L Art & Design"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Studio Project"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Studio Project Grading Rubric  (Total of 100 points; Art elements 0-20 points; Art principles 0-20 points; Color theory 0-15 points; Composition 0-10 points; Craftsmanship 0-20 points; Presentation 0-15 points)  Only three criteria were used for assessment - Art elements, Art principles and Color theory."]
["Performance Target: ","70 % of the submitted studio projects will score a grade of 70% (70 points) or more overall. On the selected criteria, the projects will score 14 points or more on Art elements; 14 points or more on Art principles; and 11 points or more on Color theory."]
["Results:","The Studio Projects that were submitted during Spring 2019 earned fair grades on Topics A and B, compared to the Topic C. Details: On Topic A Art Elements, 9 out of 22 (41%) Projects scored 70% or more (> 14 points), while on Topic B Art Principles, 8 out of 22 (36%) Projects earned 70% or more (> 14 points). On the other hand, only 5 out of 22 (23%) Projects  scored 70% or more (> 11 points). Only these three measure were studied this semester, planning to include others in the upcoming years."]
["Use of Results:","There were a few changes compared to Spring 2018 to Spring 2019 semester with regard to this course and assignments. In 2019, a different Instructor had taught the course and did not use the same rubric as before. From the new rubric, only three components were chosen for comparison. It is suggested that for the 2020 class, (1) a test be given at mid-term in order to assess the students' understanding of the art elements, principles and color theory. This would enable them to see the areas which need further study. (2) Also it is recommended that the instructor use more examples of artistic works that illustrate these properties. (3) A visual aid would enable students to see how these properties are actually used and what is considered to be proper usage."]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","NHM 102 Principles of Nutrition"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Dietary Analysis "]
["Evaluation Tool:","Dietary Analysis Rubric [Part A Analysis (Qs. 1-23) is worth 43 points; Part B Conclusion Questions (Qs. 24-26) is worth 7 points]"]
["Performance Target: ","70 % of the submitted dietary analysis projects will score a grade of 70% (35 points or more) in total. Further, on  Analysis Qs. (30 points or more); Conclusion Qs. (5 points or more)"]
["Results:","The Dietary Analysis submitted during Spring 2019 from both sections were combined to enables for ease in calculations and compilation purposes. On Part A Analysis Qs 1 - 23, 84% (21 out 25) of the Analyses scored 70% or more (30.25 points). On Conclusion Qs., Part B. 24-26, (18 out 25) 72% of the submissions earned above 4.9 points (which was 70%). Overall, in the 25 total submitted assignments, 84% of them (21 out 25) received the target 70% or more. Results from Fall 2018  showed similar outcomes. Overall (22 out of 25) 87% of the Dietary Analysis scored on the assignment (87% or more). The Analysis earned (19 out of 25) 78% accurately while (22 out of 25) 87% response accurately on the Conclusion Questions. These results were promising, however the students get some further assistance, as it might be for majority of them doing the calculations and applying the concepts into reality,  If further monitoring and student checks are conducted, it is believed that considerable progress can be made."]
["Use of Results:","(1) Early start date: All students will be expected to begin the project no later than the third week of the semester. (2) Progress deadlines: Two individual appointments will be made with students during Office Hours. First meeting is made within two-weeks after the assignment is given, when the student is explained clearly about the expectations for successful completion of the assignment. Second meeting will take place four weeks prior to the due date to review the analysis and discuss the student's progress. Instructor can respond to any concerns and/or offer recommendations accordingly. (3) Offer extra credit worth five (5) points if the all deadlines and appointments are kept."]

{"sheet":"SLO3","index":2,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":18,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[9,1,9,5],[17,1,17,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 3"]
["Students will learn the value and utility of limited resources and ways of managing them to maintain family values, performs family functions,  and reach family goals. Students will also explore the changing structure and forms of family, its roles, and functions in the modern day."]
["Outcome 3: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","HDF 312 Family Economics/Resource Management"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Chapter 8 Essay Response"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Chapter 8 Essay Response Rubric (Total = 100 points; Part A Claim & Supports = 40 points;  Part B Development = 40 points; Part C Conventions = 20 points)"]
["Performance Target: ","70 % of the submitted essays will score a grade 70% or more on Part A (28 points); Part B (28 points); Part C (14 points)"]
["Results:","On the Chapter 8 essay, majority of the essays scored greater than 70% points. Specifically, 36 out of 41 (89%) of the essays scored 70% or more on the Part A (Claim & Support); 33 out of 41 (80%) of the essays scored 70% or more points on Part B (Development); 27 out of 41 (65%) of the essays scored 70% or more on the Part C (Conventions); and finally, 36 out of 41 (89%) of the essays scored 70% or more on the Overall score (100 points). (ps: There were three missing submissions, hence earned zero points for the assignment.) "]
["Use of Results:","(1) Students will be provide in-class practice session. (2) Students will be asked to develop an outline for the essay and peer-review will be conducted. (3) Further clarifications on the concepts - Claim and Supports, and Conventions will be elaborated for better understanding."]
["Outcome 3: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","HDF 314 Family and Society "]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Final Exam"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Final Exam Key (Total 100 points. A-Matching 30 points; B-True or False 30 points; C-Fill in the Blanks 20 points; D-Short answers 20 points.)"]
["Performance Target: ","70 % of the submitted final exams will score a grade 70% (70 pts) or more points on Part A (21 pts or more), B (21 pts or more), C (14 pts or more), and D (14 pts or more)."]
["Results:","During Spring 2019, only 18 out of 31 students attempted the final exam, as others were exempt. This practice will not be continued in the upcoming  semesters to that complete and accurate data can be compiled. On Part A Matching, 13 out of 31 (42%) Exams scores > 70% (21 points), on Part B True or False, only 5 out of 31 (16%) Exams earned 70% or more (21 points), on Part C Fill in the Blanks, 15 out of 31 (48%) Exams earned 70% or more (> 14 points). On the Part D Short-Answer type Qs., only 5 out of 31 (16%) Exams earned 70% or more (> 14 points). "]
["Use of Results:","Since the Final Exams in Spring 2019 did not earn the desired outcomes of 70% students earning 70% or more, the following remedial steps are planned for the upcoming semester. (1) The instructor will conduct a review during the last 10 minutes of each class given the course is only offered once a week. (2) The instructor will provide extra study guides. (3) The instructor will encourage study groups. (4) There are also plans to revise the Exam to include critical thinking and application-type questions."]

{"sheet":"POs","index":3,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,5],[6,0,6,5],[11,1,11,5],[10,1,10,5],[9,1,9,5],[8,1,8,5],[5,1,5,5],[4,1,4,5],[3,1,3,5],[2,1,2,5],[1,0,1,5],[7,0,7,5]]}
["Program Outcome 1"]
["To improve enrollment through enhancing recruitment and retention strategies in the FCS undergraduate program."]
["Assessment Measure:","Number of recruitment activities during the year (on and off campus)"]
["Assessment Target:","Organize and execute at least three (3) recruitment events per year (AAMU High School Senior Day,  Calhoun Community Transfer Day, Graduate Students Orientation, etc.)"]
["Assessment Results:","Faculty, staff, graduate assistants, and student workers participated in all three recruitment activates during 2018-2019. Further, the Recruitment Committee also participated in other recruitment events at Lawson State Community College (Birmingham), Open House at Elmore Gym, Ernest Knight Center, among others. "]
["Use of Results:","It was realized that although recruitment efforts were in full swing, often times, were geared more towards attracting towards undergraduates. Graduate students were not targeted much. For that reason, more advertisement, PSA, and student testimonials will be planned for online release."]
["Program Outcome 2"]
["Strengthen and expand experiential and service-learning activities and opportunities for students."]
["Assessment Measure:","Total number of experiential activities conducted during the semester."]
["Assessment Target:","Each core course in the FCS program will have at least one (1) experiential activity during the semester"]
["Assessment Results:","It was found that not all Core courses consist of experiential activities. Some faculty expressed the need for in-depth learning prior to field experience, as majority of the students were in Freshman or early in their Program."]
["Use of Results:","Efforts will be taken to introduce at least one experiential activity into all master's level courses. Suggestions and recommendations will brainstormed among the graduate faculty, to select the best service-learning activities that can expand student learning. In HDF Program more community-related projects will be introduced for students to meet and serve the local families. Similar activities will be designed for AMD and NHM Programs."]

{"sheet":"List","index":4,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":3,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["Face-to-Face",null,"Yes"]
["Online",null,"No"]
["Off campus"]