{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":5,"sheets":["BS SLO1 Intro2FS 18-19","BS SLO2 Seminar.UG 18-19","BS SLO3 Sensory.Eval 18-19","POs BS FS 18-19","List"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":1,"external_links":3,"defined_names":9,"comments":3,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"BS SLO1 Intro2FS 18-19","index":0,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[9,1,9,5],[17,1,17,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 1"]
["Be able to apply and incorporate the principles of science in practical, real world situations and problems"]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","FAS 102 (Verghese)"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Final Oral Project Presentations (product development)"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Departmental rubric \"Oral Presentation (topical)\". All parts of the presentations (Introduction, Body, Conclusion) were assessed according to specific areas of the rubric including (1) Organization & Preparation and (2) Content."]
["Performance Target: ","90% of   the submitted presentations will score a \"good\" or higher in the oral group presentations in each mentioned aspect of the presentation. "]
["Results:","100% of  the submitted presentations scored a  good or better in oral group presentations.  90% of submitted presentations scored a good or better in the Organization & Preparation area and 90% of submitted presentations scored good or better in the Content area of the presentation rubric."]
["Use of Results:","The results from this past semester will be used to allow the students to continue to address more application-based topics, as the final group presentation centered around the students pitching a new food product concept to the course instructors and graduate students in the department.  This allowed students to not only focus on one central topic, but to address issues and explore trends in the food industry. Target was met. The department plans to use the same assessment method."]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","FAS 102"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Lab reports"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Departmental rubric for \"laboratory report\". Laboratory reports were assessed for the following areas: (1) Introduction & Objectives and (2) Data Analysis & Discussion"]
["Performance Target: ","80% of the lab reports  will score a \"good\" or higher on each aspect of the lab reports submitted (based on experiments conducted in Practical Friday Lab)"]
["Results:"," Of the submitted lab reports, 85% (24/28) scored  good or better  (based on experiments conducted in Practical Friday Lab). 85% (24/28) scored good or better on the Introduction & Objectives area and 85% (24/28) scored good or better on the Data Analysis & Discussion area"]
["Use of Results:","These results will verify the continued implementation of Practical Fridays in the course.  These lab sessions give students the opportunity to apply the theory that was learned during Monday and Wednesday lectures to lab situations. The target was met and the department plans to use the same assessment method."]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"BS SLO2 Seminar.UG 18-19","index":1,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5],[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 2"]
["Students will be able to correctly present and discuss information in their field of study"]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","FAS 403"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Journal Article Presentation"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Oral Presentation (topical) Rubric for all aspects of the presentation (Overall which includes:\nLanguage Use and Delivery -The student communicates ideas effectively (30%) \nOrganization and Preparation -The student exhibits logical organization (20%) \nContent -The student explains the process and findings of the project and the resulting learning (30%)\nQuestions and Answers (20%) "]
["Performance Target: ","Presentations will be submitted by 100% of students (15 ) and 100% of presentations will earn \"good\" or higher in the overall evaluation calculated by summing each of the parts \n(Language Use and Delivery The student communicates ideas effectively (30%) \nOrganization and Preparation The student exhibits logical organization (20%) \nContent The student explains the process and findings of the project and the resulting learning (30%)\nQuestions and Answers (20%) )\nof the Oral Presentation (topical) rubric."]
["Results:","All (15) of the submitted presentations with all oral presentations (topical) earning \"good\" (85%) or above on the overall evaluation that was calculated by each of the parts of the Oral Presentation (topical) Rubric.  \nEarned good or above on Language Use and Delivery -The student communicates ideas effectively (30%) (100%, 15/15 presentations)\nEarned good or above on Organization and Preparation -The student exhibits logical organization (20%) (100%, 15/15 presentations)\nEarned good or above on Content -The student explains the process and findings of the project and the resulting learning (30%) (100%, 15/15 presentations)\nEarned good or above on Questions and Answers (20%) (80%, 12/15 presentations)\n"]
["Use of Results:","Yes the target was met.  More reading assignments will be incorporated in the seminar class to increase their knowledge base which should increase the Questions and Answers portion of the score.  Lower percentages were scored in the Questions and Answers for all presentations.  This same evaluation tool and performance target will be used in the future."]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","FAS 403"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Mock Interview"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Department Mock Interview Rubric area of Technical Content (8.3%).  Additional questions will be covered with topical and technical discussions in lecture."]
["Performance Target: ","All students (100%, 15 of 15) will participate in a mock interview and adequately discuss technical content on a posted job announcement to earn \"good\" or higher in the area technical content as listed on the Department's Mock Interview Rubric."]
["Results:","All students (100%, 15 of 15) participated and earned \"Fair\" (75%) or higher in the technical content areas of the Department's Mock Interview Rubric.  Over 73% (11/15 mock interviews) earned \"Good\" (85%) or higher in the technical content area of the Department's Mock Interview Rubric. "]
["Use of Results:","No, the target was not met.  By conducting two mock interviews students are able to see and experience where they may be lacking in depth to discuss areas within their field.  Two mock interview sessions will continue in future offerings.  The Department's Mock Interview Rubric will be evaluated before the next course offering as the Criteria are equally weighted and that may need modification.  "]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"BS SLO3 Sensory.Eval 18-19","index":2,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5],[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 3"]
["Students will be able to determine sensorial differences"]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","FAS 306 (Herring)"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Lab Reports"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Laboratory Report Rubric. The Data Analysis and Discussion section will be use to assess this outcome (25%) and students will be earn a \"fair\" or higher in this section.  Additional examples datasets will be provided and discussed for students to understand and explain laboratory results."]
["Performance Target: ","Lab reports (90%) in the Data Analysis and Discussion section will receive \"fair\" or higher."]
["Results:","Lab reports (88%, 15/17 laboratory reports) correctly calculated and reported differences between samples in the Data Analysis and Discussion section to receive \"fair\" or higher."]
["Use of Results:","No, the target was not reached.  Students were able to calculate simple results (mean, mode, etc.) but exhibited difficulty in using Excel and by hand to calculate statistical differences (t-test).  Additional example datasets will be provided and online Blackboard quizzes developed to increase student comfort on calculations and software (Excel formulas)."]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","FAS 306 (Herring)"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Written Research Presentation"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Written Presentation (research) Rubric. The aspects of the written presentation to assess will be to calculate and present information regarding data to earn a \"fair\" or higher in the Data Analysis and Discussion and Conclusion sections of the written report paper"]
["Performance Target: ","Written research presentations (75%) will correctly calculate and present information regarding data to earn a \"fair\" or higher in the Data Analysis and Discussion and Conclusion sections of the written report portion of the rubric."]
["Results:","75%, 13/17 written research presentations correctly calculated and presented information for the performance target higher than \"fair\" (75%) but similar to the laboratory reports, did not calculate statistical differences (t-test).  Data Analysis and Discussion was 77% for 13/17 written research presentations while the Conclusion average was 83% for 13/17 written research presentations."]
["Use of Results:","Yes, the target was reached.  Additional examples will be provided in online learning sessions to allow the students to reinforce information presented in class as mathematical calculations appear difficult for students to absorb if only practiced in lecture and laboratory periods."]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"POs BS FS 18-19","index":3,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[1,0,1,5],[0,0,0,5],[5,1,5,5],[4,1,4,5],[3,1,3,5],[2,1,2,5],[11,1,11,5],[6,0,6,5],[7,0,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,1,10,5]]}
["Program Outcome 1"]
["To recruit undergraduate students in Food Science."]
["Assessment Measure:","Recruitment data"]
["Assessment Target:","The Program plans to recruit a minimum of 20 freshman each fall."]
["Assessment Results:","A total of 23 freshman entered the Program in the Fall of 2018."]
["Use of Results:","Yes, the program met the target for recruitment of food science freshman.  The program plans to continue the efforts to meet the target each fall.The program plans to use this measure again because it is an important initiative in the growth of the program and the university. "]
["Program Outcome 2"]
["To retain undergraduate students in Food Science"]
["Assessment Measure:","Retention data.   Currently there are 68 food science students."]
["Assessment Target:","the Fall 2018 enrollment was 71 students. The target is to retain at least 75 percent of 71 students or 53 students by spring 2019."]
["Assessment Results:","The Program retained 95 percent of 71 Food Science (23 freshman, 20 sophomores, 16 juniors and 9 seniors for a total of 68 students in Spring 2019.  Advisees met with advisers more than once each semester (registration, course advisement, career counseling, internship and scholarship information). "]
["Use of Results:","Yes, the program met the target as the Fall 2018 enrollment was 71 students with 68 in the Spring of 2019.  This is a retention of greater than 95%.  The Program will continue to  have constant interaction with advisees in addition to frequent contact with the Office of Student Engagement in the Department.  The Department will seek OIPRE for reasons regarding students not being retained. The program plans to continue the efforts to meet the target each fall.The program plans to use this measure again because it is an important initiative in the growth of the program and the university. "]

{"sheet":"List","index":4,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":3,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["Face-to-Face",null,"Yes"]
["Online",null,"No"]
["Off campus"]