{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":5,"sheets":["SLO1","SLO2","SLO3","PO","List"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":1,"external_links":0,"defined_names":5,"comments":3,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"SLO1","index":0,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[9,1,9,5],[17,1,17,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 1"]
["Students will understand the history of the field of urban planning and its theoretical underpinnings, the legal basis for the practice of planning in the U.S. context, and the governmental and economic contexts within which planners operate"]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","UPL 101 - Introduction to Urban Planning"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Final paper rubric (three domains: data collection, analysis, plans).  The paper requires students to examine the governmental and ecnomic contexts in which planners work by analyzing the community needs and how planners address these needs. By examining existing comprehensive plans, the paper also requires students to understand the legal baisis and limitations of planning authority. "]
["Evaluation Tool:","Final paper rubric (attached) "]
["Performance Target: ","80% of final papers will earn an acceptable or exemplary on each of the three rubric domains."]
["Results:","15 out of 15 (100%) of the scored final papers scored acceptable or above on the  data collection  domain of the final paper. 15 out of 15 (100%) of the scored final papers scored acceptable or above on the analysis domain of the final paper. 15 out of 15 (100%) of the scored final papers scored acceptable or above on the plans domain of the final paper. "]
["Use of Results:","The target was met.  In consultation with the faculty, BSUP program coordinator, and department chair, the target will remain unchanged. The faculty agrees that the final paper  is an effective and holistic measure of the first student learning objective. This measure requires students to address multiple components of the SLO (theory, legal basis, and contexts of planning). Faculty believe that this assignment remains an effective measure and will continue to challenge students. "]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","UPL 203 - History and Theory of Planning"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-face"]
["Assignment:","Final paper"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Final paper rubric (attached). The assignment equired students to examine within sufficient bredth and depth how planning theory has shaped the historical development of cities. "]
["Performance Target: ","80% of submitted final papers will achieve an acceptable grade or higher  (C or above) on the paper. "]
["Results:","12 out of  12 students (100  percent of students) received an acceptable (C grade) or above on the assessed item (the final paper). Of this, 58.3 percent received an A, and 41.6 received a B. "]
["Use of Results:","The target was met. In consultation with the faculty, BSUP program coordinator, and department chair, the target will remain unchanged. The faculty agree that continuing use of this target is appropriate as it relfects successful student knowedge related to SLO 1. Faculty believe that this assignment remains an effective measure and will continue to challenge students. "]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"SLO2","index":1,"n_rows":25,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":25,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[8,1,8,5],[16,1,16,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 2"]
["Students will be able to demonstrate and apply the skills necessary for practicing planners such as critical and spatial thinking, the ability to collect, analyze, and present data to diverse audiences, professional oral, written, and graphic communication."]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","UPL 216 Planning Research Methods I"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-face"]
["Assignment:","Technical report"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Grading rubric. Assignment required students to explore how practicing planner apply quantatative and spatial thinking to planning problems (data analysis and results). They had to synthesize the information and present it in written communication (the full report). "]
["Performance Target: ","80% of the submitted assignments  will earn an acceptable or exemplary on the each aspect of the assignment. "]
["Results:","2 out of 7 (29%) of the submitted report earned acceptable or exemplary on exploring how practicing planner apply quantatative and spatial thinking to planning problems (data analysis and results). 2 out of 7 (29%) of the submitted report earned acceptable or exemplary on synthesizing and presenting the assignment in written communication. "]
["Use of Results:","Target not  met. Two students (28.6 percent of students) received a C (acceptable) or above on the assignment. Five students received unacceptable grades: 1 received a D (14.3 percent of students); 4 received an F (57.1 percent of students). In consulatation with faculty, instructor plans to implement a pre-test offered at the begining of the term to allow him to calebrate his syllabus to the skills of students. The program plans to use the same assessment in next year’s plans.   "]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","UPL 316 Planning Research Methods II"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-face"]
["Assignment:","Final Exam (taken together, all questions in the exam provide a holistic measure of the SLO). "]
["Evaluation Tool:","Answer key (not included). Multiple choice exam covered basic statistical knowledge, methods of data collection and analysis frequently used in the social sciences and urban planning. "]
["Performance Target: ","80% of the submiited final exams will earn an acceptable or exemplary on the exam. "]
["Results:","5 out of 8 (62.5%) of the submitted final exams earned accepatble or exemplary on all the questions of the final exam. Eight students enrolled in this course."]
["Use of Results:","Target not  met. Three students (37.5 percent) received unacceptable scores on the exam (two received a D and one received an F). The faculty plans to meet and decide whether to give more assignments in order to better prepare students for the final exam by identifying knowledge gaps ahead of the exam. The program plans to use the same assessment in next year’s plans.   "]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"SLO3","index":2,"n_rows":27,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":27,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[1,0,1,5],[8,1,8,5],[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[16,1,16,5],[9,1,9,5],[0,0,0,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5],[5,1,5,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 3"]
["Students will be able to utilize the values of the planning profession of inclusion, diversity and social justice"]
["Outcome 3: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","UPL 404 - Social Equity in Planning"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-face"]
["Assignment:","Final exam. All the questions are relevant to the SLO"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Final exam results and grading rubric to address the bredth and depth of social justice related planning knowledge. Each question evaluated on a three-point scale: unacceptable, acceptable, exemplary"]
["Performance Target: ","80% of final exams will earn an acceptable or exemplary onon all the questions of the final exam. "]
["Results:","9 out of 11 (74.5) of the submitted exams earned acceptable or higher on all the questions of the final exam. . "]
["Use of Results:","Target not met.  The faculty plans to give more assignments in order to prepare students fo the final exam. The program plans to use the same assessment in next year’s plans.   "]
["Outcome 3: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","UPL - Professional Practice"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-face"]
["Assignment:","Complete Final paper"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Final Paper Rubric. Paper requires students to put planning values in practice through analysis of how professional planners address a selected topic and communicate that to other professionals. The entire paper was used as a holistic measure of the SLO. "]
["Performance Target: ","80% of the final papers will earn an acceptable or exemplary on the final paper. "]
["Results:","6  out of 6 (100%) of the submitted final papers earned acceptable or higher on the final paper. "]
["Use of Results:","The target was met. In consultation with the faculty, BSUP program coordinator, and department chair, the target will remain unchanged. Faculty believe that this assignment remains an effective measure and will continue to challenge students. "]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"PO","index":3,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[11,1,11,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,1,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5],[5,1,5,5],[6,0,6,5],[7,0,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,1,10,5]]}
["Program Outcome 1"]
["Increase engagement on urban and regional planning issues with the university community and the community at large"]
["Assessment Measure:","The number of lectures by the speakers from outside the university per semester"]
["Assessment Target:","DCRP will host two speakers each semester delivering a lecture on topics related to urban and regional planning"]
["Assessment Results:","DCRP and the Urban Planning Student Association hosted two guest speakers in the Fall of 2018 semester and one guest speaker in the Spring of 2019 semester. In addition, DCRP hosted the first annual Urban Planning Conference on February 22, 2019"]
["Use of Results:","DCRP will continue to host guest lectures every semester and the annual Urban Planning Conference in February. These activities are to engage students on planning issues with community at large."]
["Program Outcome 2"]
["Increase faculty scholarship activities"]
["Assessment Measure:","The number of manuscript and conference presentation paper by each faculty"]
["Assessment Target:","DCRP faculty will average one manuscript and one conference presentation paper per academic year"]
["Assessment Results:","Each DCRP faculty member had at least one manuscript and presented a paper at a conference in the 2018/2019 academic year.  "]
["Use of Results:","DCRP will continue to promote scholarship activities by faculty members through publications and academic conferences"]

{"sheet":"List","index":4,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":3,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["Face-to-Face",null,"Yes"]
["Online",null,"No"]
["Off campus"]