{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":5,"sheets":["SLO1","SLO2","SLO3","POs","List"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":1,"external_links":0,"defined_names":6,"comments":3,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"SLO1","index":0,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5],[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 1"]
["Graduate students will obtain comprehensive knowledge of major contemporary trends and issues in the FCS profession."]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","FCS 508 Trends and Issues in the Profession"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Final Exam (In-class)"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Final Exam Rubric (Total=100 pts; Part A Subject matter 0-45 pts; Part B  Significance 0-20 pts; Part C Impact 0-15 pts; Part D Connections 0-10 pts; Part E Conclusions & Summary 0-10 pts)."]
["Performance Target: ","70 % of the submitted final exams will score 70% (70 pts) or more on the total, and on each of the Parts - Part A (32 pts), Part B (14 pts), Part C (11 pts), Part D (7 pts), and Part E (7 pts)."]
["Results:","The Responses to the Final Exams scored fairly good overall. The total scores ranged from 89-91 out of 100 points. On the remaining criteria, Part A Subject Matter, scores were 43-44 out of 45 points, Part B Significance, scores were 18-20 out of 20 points, Part C Impact, the submissions earned 12-14 out of 15 points, Part D Connections, all the submissions ranged between 8-9 out of 10 points. The last criteria, Part E Conclusions & Summary, the Exam Reponses were lacking, as they only scored between 5-7 out of 10 points."]
["Use of Results:","Since the responses on Final Exam scored fairly well, with each scoring above 80% and above, which is far above the target. The only criteria, the submissions were missing was only writing skills. For that reason, the students were recommended to utilize the software 'Grammarly' available freely on University website."]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","FCS 508 Trends and Issues in the Profession"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Scholarly Paper (Take-home)"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Scholarly Paper Rubric (Total = 100 points; Introduction-20 pts; Rev of Lit-30 pts; Discussion-30 pts; Summary/Conclusions/Recomm.=20 pts)"]
["Performance Target: ","70 % of the submitted scholarly papers will score 70% (70 pts) or more on the Total;  14 pts or more - Introduction; 21 pts or more on Rev of Lit; 21 pts or more on Discussion; 14 pts of more on Summary/Conclusions/Recomm."]
["Results:","The scholarly papers submitted earned fairly high points overall, ranging from 80 - 86 out of 100 points. On Introduction, papers earned 15-18 (out of 20 points), on Review of Literature, 23-24 (out of 30 points), on Discussion, 23-25 (it of 30 points), Summary & Conclusions, 18-20 (out of 20 points). "]
["Use of Results:","With the results being above the expected target, not many remedial measures were needed. However, it was recognized that the students could use additional help with Review of Lit. and Discussion sections. Students were recommended to utilize the on-campus Writing Center and attend the workshops offered by the Graduate Studies on writing style and APA format."]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"SLO2","index":1,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[9,1,9,5],[17,1,17,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 2"]
["Graduate students will obtain comprehensive knowledge of principles of administration and leadership in FCS; including roles and responsibilities applicable in diverse workplace settings."]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","FCS 511 Administration and Leadership in FCS"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Mini Internship Report"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Mini Internship Report Rubric (Total points 100; Introduction 0-5 pts; Background/Internship site 0-15 pts; Profile 0-20 pts; Activities 0-25 pts; Value of Exp. 0-15 pts.; Summary 0-10 pts.; References 0-10 pts.)"]
["Performance Target: ","70 % of the submitted Mini Internship Reports will score 70% or more on Introduction (3.5 pts); Background/Internship site (11 pts); Profile (14 pts) Activities (18 pts) Value of Exp. (11 pts) Summary (7 pts) References (7 pts). "]
["Results:","Internship submissions scored 70% or more (> 7 points) on all the criteria. On criteria, Introduction, Summary, and References, all Reports scored 100%, On Background, scores ranged from 13-15, on Profile scores ranged from 15-20, On Value the scores ranged between 14-15, and finally, on Activities, all the submissions scored 22-24 (out of 25 points)."]
["Use of Results:","Since the Internship reports scored extremely well, not many remedial measures were needed for this assignment. However, compared to the last time it was taught, this semester, the number of Internship hours were increased from 20 hours to 40 hours."]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","FCS 511 Administration and Leadership in FCS"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Mini-Internship Presentation (In-class)"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Mini-Internship Presentation Rubric (Total number of criteria 10; (In-depth coverage; logical sequence; reasonable pace; full knowledge; audience attention; clear communication and well-prepared; communication aids; eye contact with audience; actively engage the audience; professional attire and demeanor) each criterion is worth 0-10 points; total 100 points)"]
["Performance Target: ","70 % of the presentations will score 70% (7 points) or more on each of the ten criteria."]
["Results:","Results on the presentation showed that all students scored 70% or more (> 7 points) on all the criteria. The lowest scores were earned on Communication aids (7-8, with only one score of 10 points), followed by the last criteria, appropriate attire and demeanor (7-9, with only one score of 10). The presentations secured high (8-10 points) on all the remaining eight criteria.    "]
["Use of Results:","Since the presentations scores fairly well overall, not many remedial measures were needed for this assignment. The only two criteria where the scores were at 70% level (Communication aids; Appropriate attire and demeanor) will addressed with additional instructions. Students may be offered further examples of possible communication aids to earn higher on the particular criteria."]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"SLO3","index":2,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5],[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 3"]
["Graduate students will obtain comprehensive knowledge of FCS discipline and develop the skills of writing scholarly works."]
["Outcome 3: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","At the end of the Program"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Master's Report"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Master's Report Rubric; Total score = 21 ; Each criteria ranges from 1-3; (Criteria 1-Significance/rationale; Criteria 2-Mastery of content; Criteria 3-Mastery of methods of inquiry; Criteria 4- Results/Discussion & Conclusion; Criteria 5-Quality of writing; Criteria 6-Originality and potential for contribution to the discipline; Criteria 7- Formatting, layout and structure.)"]
["Performance Target: ","At least 70% of the submitted Master's reports will earn the max. score of 3 on each of the seven criteria for a total score of 21 points."]
["Results:","Overall, all the master's reports submitted at the end of the program scored over the target set, i.e., 70% or above. The Graduate Studies would not accept them without meeting these standards and clear the students for graduation. That confirms that the reports met the required standards."]
["Use of Results:","Since the master's report scored fairly well at the end, not many remedial measures were needed. However, the students continued to struggle with some basic writing skills. For that reason, the students were recommended to utilize the software 'Grammarly' available freely on University website. Also, a few others needed assistance with finding research articles, and were asked to meet with the Librarian to seek assistance in searching the databases and locating appropriate research articles for their Reports."]
["Outcome 3: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","At the end of the Program"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Comprehensive Exam"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Comprehensive Exam Rubric Total score = 20 ; Each criteria ranges from 0-4; Criterion 1 (Subject knowledge); Criterion 2 (Address all sections via in-depth synthesis & analysis; Criterion 3 (Displays professional outlook on the topic under discussions); Criterion 4 (Demonstrate critical thinking/creativity/original thought & comprehension); Criterion 5 (Appropriate organization and coherence, professional writing skills)."]
["Performance Target: ","At least 70% of the submitted comprehensive answers will earn a score of 2-3 on each of the five criteria for a total score of 14 to pass."]
["Results:","In Spring 2019, only 50% of the Exams passed, while the rest needed retake after a second review. In Fall semester, 100% of the Exam responses earned a passing grade. Students seems to be struggling either one or both seconds of the Exam - Core and Technical. Criterion 1 Subject knowledge was most difficult one on all the Exam responses. Further, on Criterion 5, Organization and coherence, the responses needed more refinement. "]
["Use of Results:","Often times, only 50% of the responses submitted for Comprehensive Exams scored a passing grade. This was much lower than the performance target of 70%. As a remedial measure, review sessions were planned this semester to help the students understand the requirements and expectations of the Exam and criteria used for scoring their responses. Further, a few mock questions were also discussed to help them practice visualize how to plan and prepare for the Exam. Hoping to make these review sessions a bit more rigorous to meet the performance target next semester/year."]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"POs","index":3,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,5],[6,0,6,5],[11,1,11,5],[10,1,10,5],[9,1,9,5],[8,1,8,5],[5,1,5,5],[4,1,4,5],[3,1,3,5],[2,1,2,5],[1,0,1,5],[7,0,7,5]]}
["Program Outcome 1"]
["Improve enrollment through enhancing recruitment and retention strategies in the FCS graduate program."]
["Assessment Measure:","Number of recruitment/retention activities during the year (on and off campus)"]
["Assessment Target:","Organize and execute at least three (3) recruitment events per year (AAMU High School Senior Day,  Calhoun Community Transfer Day, Graduate Students Orientation, etc.)"]
["Assessment Results:","Faculty, staff, graduate assistants, and student workers participated in all three recruitment activates during 2018-2019. Further, the Recruitment Committee also participated in other recruitment events at Lawson State Community College (Birmingham), Open House at Elmore Gym, Ernest Knight Center, among others. "]
["Use of Results:","It was realized that although recruitment efforts were in full swing, often times, were geared more towards attracting towards undergraduates. Graduate students were not targeted much. For that reason, more advertisement, PSA, and student testimonials will be planned for online release."]
["Program Outcome 2"]
["Strengthen and expand experiential and service-learning activities and opportunities for students."]
["Assessment Measure:","Total number of experiential activities conducted during the semester."]
["Assessment Target:","Each graduate course in the FCS program will have at least one (1) experiential activity during the semester."]
["Assessment Results:","It was found that not all graduate courses consisted of experiential activities. Some faculty expressed the need for in-depth learning prior to field experience, as majority of the students were in still learning fundamentals of the Program need further expertise before reaching to the communities."]
["Use of Results:","Efforts will be taken to introduce at least one experiential activity into all master's level courses. Suggestions and recommendations will brainstormed among the graduate faculty, to select the best service-learning activities that can expand student learning. In HDF Program more community-related projects will be introduced for students to meet and serve the local families. Similar activities will be designed for AMD and NHM Programs."]

{"sheet":"List","index":4,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":3,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["Face-to-Face",null,"Yes"]
["Online",null,"No"]
["Off campus"]