{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":5,"sheets":["MS SLO1 Fd Enzymes 18-19","MS SLO2 Prod Safety 18-19","MS SLO3 Seminar.Grad. 18-19","POs MS FS 18-19","List"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":1,"external_links":1,"defined_names":6,"comments":3,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"MS SLO1 Fd Enzymes 18-19","index":0,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":18,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[5,1,5,5],[6,1,6,5],[9,1,9,5],[17,1,17,5],[16,1,16,5],[15,1,15,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5],[8,1,8,5],[7,1,7,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[10,0,10,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 1"]
["Combine chemical structure information with enzyme specificities to determine the products of enzymatic reactions "]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","FAS 615"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Quiz on Five subjects will be analyzed: Amylases, Lipases, Pectinases, Proteases, Cellulases and Xylanases"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Quiz scoring key. Quizzes are 4 questions in length with values of 5 points per question. Each area is equally weighted."]
["Performance Target: ","The target is that at least 65% of the submitted quizzes for each of the areas  will be higher than 70%"]
["Results:","None (0/4) of the grades were higher than 70% in Pectinases and 25% (1/4) of the grades were higher than 70% in Cellulases and Xylanases"]
["Use of Results:","TARGET NOT MET IN THREE OUT OF THE FIVE MENTIONED AREAS. The program plans to have extra lecture time will be allocated to Pectinases, Cellulases and Xylanases in the future.  "]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","FAS 615"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Five subjects will be analyzed:\nAmylases, Lipases, Pectinases, Proteases, Enzyme Biotechnology"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Final written exams. The examination was 15 questions long with multiple choice questions (10) worth 5 points each and essay (short answer) questions (5) worth 10 points each. The weightage for each area is 20%."]
["Performance Target: ","The target is that at least 65% of submitted written exams for each of the areas  will be higher than 70%"]
["Results:","25% (1/4) of the grades were higher than 70% in Amylases and  50% (2/4) of the grades were higher than 70% in Pectinases,Lipases,  Proteases, Cellulases and Xylanases"]
["Use of Results:","TARGET NOT MET IN ALL AREAS: Extra time will be allocated to Amylases.  "]

{"sheet":"MS SLO2 Prod Safety 18-19","index":1,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":18,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5],[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 2"]
["Discuss common ways that produce may become contaminated on the farm and identify the types of human pathogens that can contaminate fresh produce"]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","FAS 602 Produce Safety"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Students will develop case studies on the topic of produce safety."]
["Evaluation Tool:","The Departmental Critical Thinking Rubric will be used.  Students were assessed on all aspects of the case study. Identifies and summarizes the problem/question at issue (10%). Identifies and assesses the quality of supporting data/evidence. (20%). Identifies and considers the influence of the context on the issue (20%). Demonstrates higher level thinking by interpreting the author’s meaning or the potential bias (20%)"]
["Performance Target: ","85% of the submitted case studies will score 85% or higher in all aspects of the case study"]
["Results:","86% (6/7) of the case studies earned 85% or higher on developing case studies. 86% (6/7) of the case studies earned 85% or higher on   Identifies and summarizes the problem/question at issue (10%). 86% (6/7) of the case studies earned 85% or higher on Identifies and assesses the quality of supporting data/evidence (20%). 86% (6/7) of the case studies earned 85% or higher on Identifies and considers the influence of the context on the issue (20%). 86% (6/7) of the case studies earned 85% or higher on Demonstrates higher level thinking by interpreting the author’s meaning or the potential bias (20%)"]
["Use of Results:","TARGET MET. The program plans to continue to incorporate this assignment in this course while adding components to further challenge the graduate students."]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","FAS 602 Produce Safety"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Students will present orally on this topic."]
["Evaluation Tool:","The Departmental Presentation (Topical) Rubric. Students were assessed on their ability to clearly present on an assigned topic. Language Use and delivery (30%), Organization and Preparation (20%), Content (30%), and Questions and Answers (20%)."]
["Performance Target: ","85% of the submitted oral presentations will score 85% or higher in all aspect of the oral presentations. 85% of the submitted oral presentations will score 85% or higher on Language Use and delivery (30%). 85% of the submitted oral presentations will score 85% or higher on  Organization and Preparation (20%). 85% of the submitted oral presentations will score 85% or higher on Content (30%). 85% of the submitted oral presentations will score 85% or higher on Questions and Answers (20%)."]
["Results:","86% (6/7) of the submitted oral presentations earned 85% or higher in their ability to clearly present on an assigned topic. "]
["Use of Results:","TARGET MET. For the next time this course is offered, the program plans to add more rigor to challenge the students further."]

{"sheet":"MS SLO3 Seminar.Grad. 18-19","index":2,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5],[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 3"]
["Students will be able to make formal presentations to communicate scientific knowledge to technical audiences."]
["Outcome 3: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","FAS 697"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Mock Interview"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Mock Interview rubric. "]
["Performance Target: ","(90%) of the submitted mock interviews will address and communicate in a professional manner utilizing the appropriate level of scientific reasoning and language to earn 80% or higher on the Mock Interview rubric.   Additional questions will be covered with topical and technical discussions in presentations in additional courses in the curriculum so the students' ease in articulating scientific information is higher."]
["Results:","88% (7/8) participated in the Mock Interview and earned 80% or higher but the mock interview matrix needs to be revised. "]
["Use of Results:","TARGET NOT MET. The program still plans to  revise the Mock Interview rubric to evaluate depth of knowledge and reasoning of the students."]
["Outcome 3: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","FAS 697"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Oral Research Presentation"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Oral Research Presentation rubric. Abstract (10%), Presentation (70%), Presenter (10%), Visual Aids (10%), Language Use and Delivery (30%), Organization and Preparation (20%). "]
["Performance Target: ","(85%) of the submitted oral presentations will correctly address the topic and answer the questions in a professional manner to earn 80% or higher overall on the presentation."]
["Results:","85% (7/8) correctly addressed the topic in their presentations but exhibited difficulty on answering questions. 85% (7/8) of the presentations earned 80% or higher on Abstract (10%). 85% (7/8) of the presentations earned 80% or higher on Presentation (70%). 85% (7/8) of the presentations earned 80% or higher on Presenter (10%). 85% (7/8) of the presentations earned 80% or higher on Visual Aids (10%). 85% (7/8) of the presentations earned 80% or higher on Language Use and Delivery (30%). 85% (7/8) of the presentations earned 80% or higher on Organization and Preparation (20%). "]
["Use of Results:","TARGET MET. However, the students exhibited difficulty on answering questions. Therefore, the program  will require for the students to do follow-up on Q&A topics with the instructor by submitting written responses to ensure topics are researched by the student and understood."]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"POs MS FS 18-19","index":3,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[5,1,5,5],[3,1,3,5],[2,1,2,5],[1,0,1,5],[0,0,0,5],[4,1,4,5],[11,1,11,5],[6,0,6,5],[7,0,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,1,10,5]]}
["Program Outcome 1"]
["To increase the scholarly productivity of graduate students in the department. "]
["Assessment Measure:","1.  Number of formal presentations by graduate students of their research. Currently 24 MS students"]
["Assessment Target:","1.  Present a minimum of 1 formal presentation per MS thesis student (IFT, STEM Day, etc.)"]
["Assessment Results:","1 presented at ARD, 4 presented at SEIFT, 4 presented at MANNRS, 3 presented at IFT, 15 presented at STEM Day. Total of 27 presentations were made by 24 students."]
["Use of Results:","Continue to present at local, regional and national meetings. The program plans to encourage students enrolled in non-thesis track to make research presentations as well."]
["Program Outcome 2"]
["To increase participation in academically related activities and competitions"]
["Assessment Measure:","1. Number of activities and competitions (Teams: SEIFT product development competition, American Baking Society competition, College Bowl; Individual: Poster and oral competitions, etc.)"]
["Assessment Target:","1. At least 1 activity or competition per semester or at least 2 per academic year"]
["Assessment Results:","Two teams competed at SEIFT; 1 team for American Baking Society; 1 competed in College Bowl.  One team placed first at SEIFT"]
["Use of Results:","The program plans to encourage more graduate students to participate in this competitions.  Provide closer supervision by faculty/mentors."]

{"sheet":"List","index":4,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":3,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["Face-to-Face",null,"Yes"]
["Online",null,"No"]
["Off campus"]