{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":5,"sheets":["SLO1","SLO2","SLO3","POs","List"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":1,"external_links":0,"defined_names":5,"comments":3,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"SLO1","index":0,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[9,1,9,5],[17,1,17,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 1"]
["Graduates will be able to identify entrepreneurial opportunities and devise appropriate responses."]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","ETR 320 Plan\\Launch New Ventures"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Feasibility Analysis "]
["Evaluation Tool:","The students’ feasibility analysis will be evaluated using a rubric for grading the assignment in its different components, which include:\n-Product/Service Feasibility (10 points total) evaluated on 4 criteria: Formatting on a 0 to 2.5 points scale, Organization on a 0 to 2.5 points scale, Style on a 0 to 2.5 points scale, Level of Content on a 0 to 2.5 points scale.\n\n-Industry Feasibility (15 points total) evaluated on 4 elements: Formatting on a 0 to 3.75 points scale, Organization on a 0 to 3.75 points scale, Style on a 0 to 3.75 points scale, Level of Content on a 0 to 3.75 points scale.\n\n-Financial Feasibility (25 points total) evaluated on 3 elements: Data sources on a 3 to 9 points scale, Presentation on a 3 to 8 points scale, General Plan on a 3 to 8 points scale.\n\n"]
["Performance Target: ","80% will score 37.5 points or  75% or higher on the overall Feasibility Analysis."]
["Results:","58% (4 assignments out of 7) scored 75% or higher on their Feasibility Analysis \nFeasibility analysis results per component are: \n- Product/Service Feasibility: 71.4% scored 75% or higher (5 students out of 7). Product/Service Feasibility results per criterion: Formatting 85% (6 out of 7 assignments) scored 75% or higher; Style 71.4% (5 out of 7 assignments) scored 75% or higher; Organization 71.4 % (5 out of 7 assignments) scored 75% or higher; 14.2 % Level of Content (1 out of 7 assignments) scored 75% or higher. \n- Industry Feasibility: 28.5 % scored 75% or higher (2 assignments out of 7).\n Industry Feasibility results per criterion: Formatting 42% (3 out of 7 assignments) scored 75% or higher; Style 14.2% (1 out of 7 assignments) scored 75% or higher; Organization 42 % (3 out of 7 assignments) scored 75% or higher; Level of Content 0%  (0 out of 7 assignments) scored 75% or higher. \n-Financial Feasibility: 28.5 % scored (2 assignments out of 7) scored 75% or higher. \nFinancial Feasibility Results per criterion are: Presentation 14.2% (1 assignment out of 7) scored 75% or higher; Data Source 14.2% (1 assignment out of 7) scored 75% or higher; General Plan 42% (3 out of 7 assignments) scored 75% or higher. \n\n\n  "]
["Use of Results:","Students attending ETR 320 have different backgrounds, entrepreneurial knowledge and competencies. 86% of students of the course were engineering students with major in construction management.  In order to support non-ETR students without affecting the growth of the rest of the class, the introduction of lab days for the 30% of the course may help meet the goal and improve especially in the Level of Content, Style and Data Source criteria. During the lab days, students can dedicate time to work on assignments, receive one-to-one feedback from the instructor while working on projects in order to improve in a learning by doing environment where the final result comes from an interactive lab routine with instructor and classmates.  "]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","MGT 352- Entrepreneurship"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face, Online"]
["Assignment:","Final Exam"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Students’ understanding of core concepts of Entrepreneurship will be graded with rubric and answer key. \nThe exam includes 20 questions (0.25 points per question) in the on-line class and 20 questions (1.75 points per question) in the face-to-face class. \n"]
["Performance Target: ","At least 80% of the submitted exams should obtain a score of 70% or above in the final exam.  "]
["Results:","92% (24 exams out of 26) performed 70% or above in the face-to-face class and earned 1.75 on at least 14 questions out of 20 of the final exam; 59% (10 out of 17) performed 70% or above in the on-line class and earned 0.25 on at least 15 questions out of 20 of the final exam.\n\n"]
["Use of Results:","In order to further improve the performance some additional workshop days (total of 35% of the course) may be implemented in the face-to-face class to support students in the application of entrepreneurial skills beyond the theory, and more structured assignments focused on small business management may support the performance as well in on-line and face to face class. "]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"SLO2","index":1,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5],[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 2"]
["Graduates will be able to communicate persuasively to important stakeholders in order to cultivate social and financial capital."]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","MGT 250 Managerial Communication"]
["Course Mode:","Off campus, face-to-face"]
["Assignment:","(1) Oral consulting project reports, and (2) Project reports and presentations"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Evaluation of students ability to successfully design and deliver oral presentations based on the following components. (25%)Presentation design to include PowerPoint design and visual clarity. (25%)Presentation Content to include material and information covered. (25%) Student Professionalism to include student attire. (25%)Presentation delivery to include presentation style, engagement, team synergy. "]
["Performance Target: ","At least 80% will score 75% or higher in the Oral Presentation (18.75% in each component)."]
["Results:","80% (27 oral presentations out of 30 scored 81% or above). 27 out of 30 (80%) of the presentations scored 18.75 on the Presentation design to include PowerPoint design and visual clarity (25%) component of the presentation.27 out of 30 (80%) of the presentations scored 18.75 on the Presentation Content to include material and information covered (25%) component of the presentation. 27 out of 30 (80%) of the presentations scored 18.75 on the Student Professionalism to include student attire (25%) component of the presentation. 27 out of 30 (80%) of the presentations scored 18.75 on the Presentation delivery to include presentation style, engagement, team synergy (25%) component of the presentation. "]
["Use of Results:","To further improve performance it may be useful to assess students experience and familiarity  with giving presentations beforehand and possibly be more deliberate with pairing students with less experience with more experienced presenters to encourage students to strengthen each other through team work collaboration and support. "]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","ETR 440- Field Studies in Entrepreneurship Firms"]
["Course Mode:","Off campus"]
["Assignment:","Submit oral and written reports to supervisors during experential learning experiences."]
["Evaluation Tool:","Supervisor Evaluation form based on following components: Job Knowledge/Competency; Productivity; Planning/Organization; Responsability/Initiative;Problem Solving/Resourcefulness; Interpersonal Skills/Teamwork; Communication Skills; Attendance/Punctuality and Overall Evaluation.  Each component evaluated on a three-point scale: does not meet expectations, meet expectations, exceeds expectations. The Overall Evaluation based on a 0-100 scale."]
["Performance Target: ","At least 80%  scores 75 points or higher on the Overall Evaluation completed  by their internship supervisor (\"meet expectations\" in each component)."]
["Results:","100% (4 out of 4) of the submitted internship forms gained 75 points or higher on the Overall Evaluation. \n100% (4 out of 4) of the submitted internship forms scored \"meet expectations\" or above on the Knowledge/Competency component of the internship form.  100% (4 out of 4) of the submitted internship forms scored \"meet expectations\" or above on the Productivity component of the internship form.  100% (4 out of 4) of the submitted internship forms scored \"meet expectations\" or above on the Planning/Organization component of the internship form. 100% (4 out of 4) of the submitted internship forms scored \"meet expectations\" or above on the Responsability/Initiative component of the internship form.  100% (4 out of 4) of the submitted internship forms scored \"meet expectations\" or above on the Problem Solving/Resourcefulness component of the internship form.  100% (4 out of 4) of the submitted internship forms scored \"meet expectations\" or above on the Interpersonal Skills/Teamwork component of the internship form.  100% (4 out of 4) of the submitted internship forms scored \"meet expectations\" or above on the Communication Skills component of the internship form.  100% (4 out of 4) of the submitted internship forms scored \"meet expectations\" or above on the Attendance/Punctuality component of the internship form. \n"]
["Use of Results:","To further improve the performance it may be useful to survey the supervisors of students who scored from 75 to 95 in the Overall Evaluation to ask them more specific details and recommendations on how to better prepare our students."]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"SLO3","index":2,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5],[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 3"]
["\nStudents will demonstrate knowledge and understanding of core concepts in Entrepreneurship"]
["Outcome 3: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","ETR 445 Senior Portfolio: Writing a Business Plan"]
["Course Mode:","Online"]
["Assignment:","Design and develop a comprehensive business plan to start a small business."]
["Evaluation Tool:","Business plan will be evaluated through a rubric built on four areas: Formatting, Organization, Level of content and Style. Each area is based on a 0 to 2.5 points scale (10 points in total). The business plan consists of 6 phases (60 points total). The 6 phases of the Business Plan are: \n1. Company profile \n2.Product/Service\n3.Market Assessment\n4. Strategic Implementation \n5.Financial Plan\n6.Excecutive Summary"]
["Performance Target: ","At least 80% of the business plans will earn a score of 2.5 on each area of the business plan and will earn 6.5 points on each phase of the plan or 39 points or higher for the 6 phases collectively  (65%). \n"]
["Results:","33% of the business plans (1 out of 3 ) earned collectively 39 points or over for the 6 phases (65%). 33% (1out of 3) of the business plans (1 out of 3 ) earned 6.5 points on company profile phase of the business plan and earned 2.5 points on formatting, 2.5 points organization, 0 point on style, and 0 point of level of content. 33% (1out of 3) of the business plans (1 out of 3 ) earned 6.5 points on product/service phase of the business plan and earned 2.5 points on formatting, 2.5 points organization, 0 point on style, and 0 point of level of content. 33% (1out of 3) of the business plans (1 out of 3 ) earned 6.5 points on martket assessment phase of the business plan and earned 2.5 points on formatting, 2.5 points organization, 0 point on style, and 0 point of level of content. 33% (1out of 3) of the business plans (1 out of 3 ) earned 6.5 points on strategic assessment phase of the business plan and earned 2.5 points on formatting, 2.5 points organization, 0 point on style, and 0 point of level of content. 33% (1out of 3) of the business plans (1 out of 3 ) earned 6.5 points on financial plan phase of the business plan  and earned 2.5 points on formatting, 0 points organization, 0 point on style, and 2.5 points of level of content. 33% (1out of 3) of the business plans (1 out of 3 ) earned 6.5 points on executive summary phase of the business plan  and earned 2.5 points on formatting, 0 points organization, 0 point on style, and 2.5 points of level of content. \n\n"]
["Use of Results:","tARGET NOT MET. The small size of the class and the independent format negatively affected the performance. In order to meet the performance target, the first assignment of the course may be a Business Plan Gantt where students, according to the provided BP template and Syllabus, autonomously create a Gantt that the Instructor assesses and eventually adjusts. A rubric for the Gantt must be created to grade the assignment. This will help empower the students as independent entrepreneurs and learners. In order to improve the area Level of Content mentorship sessions with entrepreneurs may be offered to students. In order to improve the areas Style and Organization students may be encouraged to participate at the AAMU Writing Center workshops."]
["Outcome 3: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","ETR 495 Entrepreneru Intership, ETR 495 Entrepreneurshp Internship, ETR 495 Entreprenership Intership, ETR 495 Entrepreneurshp Internship"]
["Course Mode:","Off campus"]
["Assignment:","Interrnship Evaluation Form."]
["Evaluation Tool:","Internship evaluation form to evaluate the following components:  Job Knowledge/Competency; Productivity; Planning/Organization; Responsability/Initiative;Problem Solving/Resourcefulness; Interpersonal Skills/Teamwork; Communication Skills; Attendance/Punctuality and Overall Evaluation.  Each component evaluated on a three-point scale: does not meet expectations, meet expectations, exceeds expectations. The Overall Evaluation based on a 0-100 scale.\n"]
["Performance Target: ","At least 80% scores 75 points or higher on the Overall Evaluation completed  by their intership supervisor.  "]
["Results:","80% (4  out of 5)  of the submitted internship forms gained 75 points or higher on the Overall Evaluation.  80% (4 out of 5) of the submitted internship forms scored \"meet expectations\" or above on the Knowledge/Competency component of the internship. 80% (4 out of 5) of the submitted internship forms scored \"meet expectations\" or above on the Productivity component of the internship. 80% (4 out of 5) of the submitted internship forms scored \"meet expectations\" or above on the Planning/Organization component of the internship. 80% (4 out of 5) of the submitted internship forms scored \"meet expectations\" or above on the Responsability/Initiative component of the internship. 80% (4 out of 5) of the submitted internship forms scored \"meet expectations\" or above on the Problem Solving/Resourcefulness component of the internship. 80% (4 out of 5) of the submitted internship forms scored \"meet expectations\" or above on the Interpersonal Skills/Teamwork component of the internship. 80% (4 out of 5) of the submitted internship forms scored \"meet expectations\" or above on the Communication Skills component of the internship. 80% (4 out of 5) of the submitted internship forms scored \"meet expectations\" or above on the Attendance/Punctuality component of the internship."]
["Use of Results:","To further improve the performance it may be useful to survey the supervisors of students who scored from 75 to 95 points to ask them more specific details and recommendations on how to better prepare our students.  Moreover, for the areas Productivity, Planning/Organization and Problem Solving/Resourcefulness students met expectation but did not exceed. For these areas, focused material may be provided to students if in the midterm evaluation their scores are below target."]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"POs","index":3,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,5],[6,0,6,5],[11,1,11,5],[10,1,10,5],[9,1,9,5],[8,1,8,5],[5,1,5,5],[4,1,4,5],[3,1,3,5],[2,1,2,5],[1,0,1,5],[7,0,7,5]]}
["Program Outcome 1"]
["Students completing the entrepreneurship program shall demonstrate above average performance in all student learning outcomes (SLO) related to the disciplines and presented in the report."]
["Assessment Measure:","\n\nThe average of results of courses considered for SLO1, SLO 2 and SLO 3. "]
["Assessment Target:","At least 55% of students should meet the target for each SLO"]
["Assessment Results:","67% of students met the target for SLO1; 90% of students met the target for SLO2; 33% of 56% of students met the result for SLO3"]
["Use of Results:","To further improve the performance will be useful to follow the recommendations \"Use of Results\" of each SLO r sistematically rotate the courses included in the evaluation report. "]
["Program Outcome 2"]
["To ensure that Entrepreneurship students are on track for graduation. "]
["Assessment Measure:","Completion, Submission and Approval of Junior Audit form. "]
["Assessment Target:","At least 75% of Entrepreneurship juniors that are eligible for junior audits have them completed, submitted, and approved by the Registrar's Office."]
["Assessment Results:","At least 75% of students have completed, submitted and received approval by the Registrar's Office for Junior Audit."]
["Use of Results:","Results are not  reliable due to a problem in the official records with the CIP code for Entrepreneurship Students.  Records do not show any ETR junior students for the Academic Year 2018-2019, so the results are only based on Advisors documentation."]

{"sheet":"List","index":4,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":3,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["Face-to-Face",null,"Yes"]
["Online",null,"No"]
["Off campus"]