{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":5,"sheets":["SLO1","SLO2","SLO3","POs","List"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":1,"external_links":0,"defined_names":5,"comments":3,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"SLO1","index":0,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[9,1,9,5],[17,1,17,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 1"]
["Pedagogical Content Knowledge-Elementary Education completers will demonstrate their ability to apply pedagogical content knowledge in content area in lesson planning."]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","ECE 305: M/M of Teaching of Teaching Mathematics"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Planning for Instruction "]
["Evaluation Tool:","Planning for Instruction Rubric: The benchmark consist of -(1)Development, Learning, and Motivation, (2) Mathematics,  (3)lesson integrations, (4)diverse learners, (5)critical thinking and problem solving,  (6) Active engagement; (7) Assessment; (8) Professionlism- rubric which  assesses Elementary Education completers' ability to plan lessons. The various level range from (1)Developing,  (2) Emgering, (3) Meets Expectations and (4) Exceeds Expectations"]
["Performance Target: ","Eighty percent (80% )of the planning for instruction rubric assignments are expected to attain an average score of 3.00 or \"Meets Expectations\" on the Planning for Instruction Rubric.  "]
["Results:","The Planning for Instruction Rubric was used to analyze outcome one. The Elementary Education completers met the average benchmark score with average score of 3.62. Technology is the lowest indicator with a mean score of 2.17. There were several areas of strength-1(1) Essential Questions; (2) Essential Standards; (3)  Learning Targets; (4) Instructional Resources; and  (5) Accommodations and Modifications. (PLEASE INCLUDE THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS WHO SUCCESSFULLY MET THE OUTCOME FROM THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS ASSESSED). (PLEASE LIST THE RESULTS OF EACH ASSESSED ITEM OF THE ASSIGNMENT) EXAMPLE:  8 out of 10 (80%) of the submitted assignments score 3 or higher on the essential questions item of the assignment. 8 out of 10 (80%) of the submitted assignments score 3 or higher on the essential standards item of the assignment. 8 out of 10 (80%) of the submitted assignments score 3 or higher on the learning targets item of the assignment. 8 out of 10 (80%) of the submitted assignments score 3 or higher on the instructional resources item of the assignment. 8 out of 10 (80%) of the submitted assignments score 3 or higher on the accomodations and modifications item of the assignment. "]
["Use of Results:","The Elementary Education faculty will continue to make adjustments to the instructional strategies to addresss the Technology indicator for this particular class to make sure our completers are integrating technology into the lesson plans. The faculty will also make adjustments to the instruction to strengthen  completers proficiency to integration of 21st Century skills into their completers lessons. The program  "]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","ECE  303:M/M of Teaching Science and Health"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Planning for Instruction"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Planning for Instruction Rubric: The benchmark consist of an 8 item rubric which  assesses Elementary Education completers' ability to plan lessons. The items addressed are  (1)Development, Learning, and Motivation, (2) Science   (3)lesson integrations, (4)diverse learners, (5)critical thinking and problem solving,  (6) Active engagement; (7) Assessment; (8) Professionlism. The various level range from (1)Developing,  (2) Emgering, (3) Meets Expectations and (4) Exceeds Expectation"]
["Performance Target: "," Eighty percent (80%) of the  planning for instruction assignments are expected to attain the score  of 3 00 or \"Meets Expectations\" on each assignments. "]
["Results:","The Elementary Education faculty used the Planning for Instruction Rubric to analyze completers' ability to plan lessons. The completers reached their benchmark goal with a mean score of 3.90. All  indicators had an average score of 3.00 or greater.  (PLEASE INCLUDE THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS WHO SUCCESSFULLY MET THE OUTCOME FROM THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS ASSESSED). (PLEASE LIST THE RESULTS OF EACH ASSESSED ITEM OF THE ASSIGNMENT). EXAMPLE:  9 out of 10 (90%) of the submitted assignments score 3 or higher on the curriculum alignment item of the assignment. 9 out of 10 (90%) of the submitted assignments score 3 or higher on the classroom time required item of the assignment. 9 out of 10 (90%) of the submitted assignments score 3 or higher on the materials needed item of the assignment. 9 out of 10 (90%) of the submitted assignments score 3 or higher on the modifications item of the assignment. 9 out of 10 (90%) of the submitted assignments score 3 or higher on the activities item of the assignment. 9 out of 10 (90%) of the submitted assignments score 3 or higher on the technology item of the assignment. "]
["Use of Results:","The Elementary Educatir faculty will continue to monitor the future completers abiity to plan lessons and will make changes to strengthen and challenge candidate's level of proficiency. The program will use thisThe program will use this assessment measure on next year's plans. "]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"SLO2","index":1,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5],[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 2"]
["Elementary Education completers will demonstrate their understanding of the pedagogy, priniciples, and strategies for teaching children how to comprehend text."]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","ECE 407: Intermediate Readers"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Praxis II: Teaching Reading Assessment Comprehension Category "]
["Evaluation Tool:","Established national score range of 14-22 or higher. The benchmark assessment is based on Elemetnary Education completers's score on the Teaching Reading Praxis category for comprehension strategies."]
["Performance Target: ","Eighty percent( 80 %) of the submitted Praxis II examinations will earn an establish national score range of 14-22 points for the comprehension category of the Praxis. "]
["Results:","Elementary Educatin completers' Praxis 2: Teaching Reading Category IV Comprehension scores were used to analyze this SLO. Both completers were successful at reaching the level of proficiency on this assessment. The mean score for this category was 20 out of 26 points. The national score range for this assessment was 16-21 pooints. Both scored at the upper performance range of 20 points.  EXAMPLE:  2 out of 2 (100%) of the submitted Praxis examinations scored 20 points or higher on the Teaching Reading Assessment Comprehension of the exam which is within the national score range from 16-21 points. "]
["Use of Results:","The Elementary Education faculty will continue to monitor our students performance on future Praxis II: Teaching Reading Category IV to make instructinal decsision to  increasing our completers proficieny. The program plans to assess this assessment measure on next year's plans. AFTER CONSULTING WITH OIPRE, THE PROGRAM WILL MODIFY ITS PRE AND POST ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTS ACCORDINGLY."]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","ECE407:Intermediate Readers, ECE 407:Intermediate Readers"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Planning for Instruction "]
["Evaluation Tool:","Planning for Instruction Rubric. The benchmark consist of an 11 item rubric which  assesses Elementary Education completers' ability to plan for instruction for reading comprehension. The various level range from (1)Developing,  (2) Emgering, (3) Meets Expectations and (4) Exceeds Expectations. "]
["Performance Target: ","Eighty percent (80%) of the submitted planning for instruction assignments are expected to earn an average score of 3.00 or \"Meets Expectations\" on the Planning for Instruction Rubric.  "]
["Results:","MISSING: What were the results of each item of the assessed planning for instruction assignment? Please list the results of each assessed item of the planning for instruction assignment. "]
["Use of Results:","MISSING: How were the results used to make changes in the program? THERE IS UNSUFFICIENT DATA TO  PROPERLY FORMULATE A PLAN OF ACTION. AFTER CONSULTING WITH OIPRE, THE PROGRAM WILL MODIFY ITS PRE AND POST ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTS ACCORDINGLY."]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"SLO3","index":2,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5],[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 3"]
["Elementary education completers will display their ability to impact students learning."]
["Outcome 3: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","ELE 495"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Impact Student Learning InTASC Assignment"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Impact Student Learning InTASC Rubric. PLEASE LIST THE SELECTED CRITERIA/ELEMENTS TO BE EVALUATED. "]
["Performance Target: ","80% of the submitted InTASC assignements will attain  a score of 3.00 or greater or \"Meet Expectactions\" on each element of the Internship Rubric to assess completers' ability to impact  learning. "]
["Results:","The InTASC internship[ rubric was analyze to determine the success of this SLO. All or 100% of the Elementary Education completers attained a mean score 4.00. (PLEASE INCLUDE THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS WHO SUCCESSFULLY MET THE OUTCOME FROM THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS ASSESSED) . (PLEASE LIST THE RESULTS OF EACH ASSESSED ELEMENT OF THE ASSIGNMENT). EXAMPLE: 10 out of 10 (100%) of the submitted assignments scored 4 on the design for instruction and assessment element of the assignment. 10 out of 10 (100%) of the submitted assignments scored 4 on the analysis of student learning element of the assignment. 10 out of 10 (100%) of the submitted assignments scored 4 on the reflection on student learning element of the assignment. "]
["Use of Results:","Target met. The Elementary Education faculty will continue to monitor program completers impact they have on students in their internship as part of the core standards that the candidates must demonstrate. The program will use this assessment measure on next year's plans. AFTER CONSULTING WITH OIPRE, THE PROGRAM WILL MODIFY ITS PRE AND POST ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTS ACCORDINGLY."]
["Outcome 3: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","ECE 305:M/M of Teaching Mathematics"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Effect on Learning; Diagnostic Interview and  Math Task"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Diagnostic Interview and Math Task Rubric: The benchmark assessment is  based on 4 item rubric (PLEASE LIST THE FOUR ITEMS TO BE ASSESSED) with four levels of proficiency-(1) Developing, (2) Emerging, (3) Meets Expectation, and (4) Exceeds Exprectations."]
["Performance Target: ","Eighty percent (80%) of the submitted assignments are expected to attain a mininum score of 3.00 or \"Meets Expectations\" on the Effect on Learning Math Task on each item of the assignment."]
["Results:","The Effect on Learning: Diagnostic Interview and Math Task Rubric was analyzed to determine completers' ability to impact learning in mathematics. All completers were proficient on the assignment with a means score of 3.31. All individual indicators had a mean score of 3.00 or greater. \"Analysis of student work samples\" indicator will be especially closely monitored to make adjustments to this indicator in  order to strengthen completers proficiency.   (PLEASE INCLUDE THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS WHO SUCCESSFULLY MET THE OUTCOME FROM THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS ASSESSED) . (PLEASE LIST THE RESULTS OF EACH ASSESSED ITEM OF THE ASSIGNMENT). EXAMPLE: 10 out of 10 (100%) of the submitted assignments scored 3 or higher on the diagnostic interview item of the assignment. 10 out of 10 (100%) of the submitted assignments scored 3 or higher on the selection and math task lesson plan item of the assignment. 10 out of 10 (100%) of the submitted assignments scored 3 or higher on the rpost assessment item of the assignment. 10 out of 10 (100%) of the submitted assignments scored 3 or higher on the reflections item of the assignment. "]
["Use of Results:","The Effect on Learning: Diagnostic Interview and Math Task Rubric use the results to determine any courses related changes to strengthen this assignment. The program plans to assess this assessment measure on next year's plans. AFTER CONSULTING WITH OIPRE, THE PROGRAM WILL MODIFY ITS PRE AND POST ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTS ACCORDINGLY."]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"POs","index":3,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,5],[6,0,6,5],[11,1,11,5],[10,1,10,5],[9,1,9,5],[8,1,8,5],[5,1,5,5],[4,1,4,5],[3,1,3,5],[2,1,2,5],[1,0,1,5],[7,0,7,5]]}
["Program Outcome 1"]
["To decrease the number of attempts on the Praxis II: Multiple Subjects and Teaching Reading. "]
["Assessment Measure:","Praxis II Data"]
["Assessment Target:","Assessment target is reduction of Elementary Education completers number of attempts to attain a passing score for each subtest of the Praxis II assessment by 3%. To decrease the number of attempts to 1 attempt on all subtests for 2018-19. "]
["Assessment Results:","All or 100% of the Elementary Education completers attain a passing score on all parts of the Praxis II Mutliple Subject Assessment and the Teaching Reading Assessments. However, the mean number off attempts is greater than desired for the Mathematics (3.50), Teaching Reading (1.50), and Social Studie (1.50) subtests. (WHAT WERE THE NUMBER OF ATTEMPTS FROM 2017-18?) PLEASE COMPARE RESULTS FROM 2017-18 TO 2018-19. "]
["Use of Results:","The Elementary Education faculty will use results of the Praxis II assessment to make programmatic and course related changes to include Praxis II related question embedded in the methods courses. "]
["Program Outcome 2"]
["Elementary Education program will increase then number of completers passing edTPA"]
["Assessment Measure:","Elementary Education completers attain a score of 44 or higher on edTPA. Data on completers passing the edTPA"]
["Assessment Target:","Assessment target is to increase the number of Elementary Education completers attaining a score of 44 or higher on edTPA for initial certification and licensure by 5%. "]
["Assessment Results:","Elementary Eduation completers attaining a score of 44 or higher on edTPA has increased from 33% in the spring 2018 semester to 100% in Fall 2018 semester. Both completers obtained a higher passing score of 57 and 45. (PLEASE COMPARE THIS YEAR'S RESULTS TO LAST YEAR'S RESULTS)."]
["Use of Results:","Elementary Education faculty will continue to monitor completers edTPA scores to stregnthen our overall program to maintain 100% passing rate. Furthermore, the faculty will increase the rigor in the overall program to challenge completers to attain a passing score of 50 or greater. "]

{"sheet":"List","index":4,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":3,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["Face-to-Face",null,"Yes"]
["Online",null,"No"]
["Off campus"]