{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":5,"sheets":["SLO1","SLO2","SLO3","POs","List"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":1,"external_links":0,"defined_names":5,"comments":3,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"SLO1","index":0,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[9,1,9,5],[17,1,17,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 1"]
["Elementary Education completers will demonstrate their knowledge of elementary school curriculum "]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","ELE 519"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Elementary Educations Traditional Master's Comprehensive Final: Curriculum Question"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Comprehensive Examination Scoring Report : Curriculum Rubric. The benchmark assessment for the Curriculum Rubric is based on elementary education candidates in four categories: Understanding of Question (20%), Response to Questions (50%), Support (20%), and Organization and Language(10%) to answer to four questions in the curriculum area. Each category is assessed on a four point scale: 4=strong, 3=acceptable, 2=marginal, 1 unaccepatble.  A score of 80% is required to pass the examination."]
["Performance Target: ","Eighty percent ( 80%) of the submitted examinations must attain a score of 12.8 points or  80% or above to show mastery of elementary school curriculum. "]
["Results:","The Comprehensive Asssessment Rubric was used to analyze the proficiency of the traditional masters completers. Two out of the two (100%)  of  this Comprehensive Final Examination with a mean score of 90% on the Curriculum question. 2 out of 2 (100%) of the submitted comprehensive exams scored 3.2 points on the Understanding of Question (20%) category of the curriculum section of the exam.  2 out of 2 (100%) of the submitted comprehensive exams scored 3.2 points on the Response to Questions (50%) category of the curriculum section of the exam.  2 out of 2 (100%) of the submitted comprehensive exams scored 3.2 points on the Support (20%)category of the curriculum section of the exam.  2 out of 2 (100%) of the submitted comprehensive exams scored 3.2 points on the Organization and Language(10%) category of the curriculum section of the exam. "]
["Use of Results:","The results of the Comprehensive Assessment Rubric will be used to make programmatic and comprehension examination question changes based on completers' responses to the questions. This program plans to use this assessment again to monitor the proficiency  of the program. "]
["Outcome 1: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","ELE 519: Elementary School Curriculum"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Curriculum Mapping "]
["Evaluation Tool:","The benchmark assessment for the Curriculum Mapping Rubric is based on elementary education candidates ability to plan the curriculum for specific content area. Candidates must create a chart/table examining the standards for the content area. From the chart/table four questions to be assessed: 1) how are standards arranged? 2) How many standards are there? List them in the chart. 3) What are some notable areas or misconceptions that may have been different in your past taechin? 4) What areas will you plan to change based on this analysis?  Each question is assessed on a four point scale: 4=strong, 3=acceptable, 2=marginal, 1 unaccepatble.  A score of 80% is required to show mastery in the curriculum mapping assignment."]
["Performance Target: ","Eighty percent (80%) of the submitted curriculum mapping assignments will earn 12.8 points or 80% or higher  to show mastery in the curriculum mapping assignment. "]
["Results:","The Curriculum Mapping Rubric was used to analyze this SLO related to curriculum. 1 out of 1 (100%) made a mean score 90% on this assessment. 1 out of 1 (100%) of the submitted response to the curriculum mapping assignment scored 3.2 points or higher on answering how are standards arranged? question of the curriculum mapping assignment. 1 out of 1 (100%) of the submitted response to the curriculum mapping assignment scored 3.2 points or higher on answering How many standards are there? List them in the chart question of the curriculum mapping assignment . 1 out of 1 (100%) of the submitted response to the curriculum mapping assignment scored 3.2 points or higher on answering What are some notable areas or misconceptions that may have been different in your past taechin? question of the curriculum mapping assignment 1 out of 1 (100%) of the submitted response to the curriculum mapping assignment scored 3.2 points or higher on answering What areas will you plan to change based on this analysis? question of the curriculum mapping assignment. "]
["Use of Results:","The results of the Curriculum Map will be used to make programmatic and course changes to offer completers a more rigorouse assignment to measure this SLO. This program will use this assessment again to monitor the proficiency of the program. "]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"SLO2","index":1,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5],[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 2"]
["Elementary Education Traditiona Masters completers will demonstrate a commitment to teaching with technology. "]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","FED 529 (Instructional Technology)"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Benefits of Technology in the Classroom. "]
["Evaluation Tool:","Benefits of Technology in the Classroom Rubric: Benchmark for this assignment is based on Elementary Education Candidates ability to explain the beneifts of using technology in the classroom. \nResearch paper writing rubric to evaluate four aspects of the paper: content focus, organization and structure, grammar and mechanics, and research methods. Each evaluated on a three point scale: 3- meet expectations, 2- progressing, 1- emerging\n"]
["Performance Target: ","Eighty percent (80%) of the  of the submitted research papers must attain a \"3\" meet expectations or better on each aspect of the paper to  show mastery for this assignment. "]
["Results:","Benefits of Technology in the Classroom Rubric: Benchmark for this assignment is based on Elementary Education Candidates ability to explain the beneifts of using technology in the classroom. One hundred (100%) of our completers score a B or above on this assignment. (PLEASE INCLUDE THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS WHO SUCCESSFULLY MET THE OUTCOME FROM THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS ASSESSED). (PLEASE LIST THE RESULTS OF EACH ASSESSED ASPECT OF THE PAPER). EXAMPLE: 2 out of 2 (100%) of the submitted Benefits of Technology papers scored 3 on the content focus aspect of the paper. 2 out of 2 (100%) of the submitted Benefits of Technology papers scored 3 on the organization and structure aspect of the paper. 2 out of 2 (100%) of the submitted Benefits of Technology papers scored 3 on the grammar and mechanics aspect of the paper. 2 out of 2 (100%) of the submitted Benefits of Technology papers scored 3 on the research methods aspect of the paper. "]
["Use of Results:","Target met. Program faculty will continue analyze completers performance to determine programatic changes as deemed necessary. Benchmark for this assignment is based on Elementary Education Candidates ability to explain the beneifts of using technology in the classroom. The program will use this measure in next year's plans "]
["Outcome 2: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","FED 529 (Instructional Technology)"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Connecting ISTE Standards to Personal Technology. "]
["Evaluation Tool:","Pre-Service Teacher Technology Survey  to assess the ISTE Standards to Personal Technology. 3 out of 21 questions survey on personal technology to be evaluated: 1 ) use my computer to communicate, 2) complete all of my assignments with my computer, and 3) explore how to use new and emerging technology.  Each response will earn a score of ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (4) on each of the three survey questions."]
["Performance Target: ","Eight percent (80%) of the submitted survey questions for the ISTE Standards to Personal Technology will earn a score of strongly agree on each selected survey question for ISTE. "]
["Results:","One (50%) of the Elementary Education completers enrolled and passed FED 529 (Instructional Technology) course prior to embedding the survey into the class. The elementary Education completer ( 50%) indicated her level of ability in integrating the use of technology in teaching either indicating \"Strongly Agree\" and \"Agree\" with the statements with a mean score of 3.50.  (PLEASE INCLUDE THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS WHO SUCCESSFULLY MET THE OUTCOME FROM THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS ASSESSED). (PLEASE LIST THE RESULTS OF EACH ASSESSED SURVEY QUESTION). EXAMPLE: 4 out of 4 (100%) responses to question 1 use my computer to communicate scored agree/strongly agree on the survey. 4 out of 4 (100%) responses to question 2 complete all of my assignments with my computer scored agree/strongly agree on the survey. 4 out of 4 (100%) responses to question 3 explore how to use new and emerging technology scored agree/ strongly agree on the survey."]
["Use of Results:","Program faculty will continue analyze completers performance to determine programatic changes as deemed necessary. ."]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"SLO3","index":2,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[17,1,17,5],[6,1,6,5],[7,1,7,5],[8,1,8,5],[9,1,9,5],[10,0,10,5],[11,1,11,5],[12,1,12,5],[13,1,13,5],[14,1,14,5],[15,1,15,5],[16,1,16,5],[5,1,5,5],[0,0,0,5],[1,0,1,5],[2,0,2,5],[3,1,3,5],[4,1,4,5]]}
["Student Learning Outcome 3"]
["Elementary Education Traditional Masters Program completers will display the dispositions of an master educator. "]
["Outcome 3: Assessment Measure 1"]
["Class:","ELE 519"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Professional Dispositions"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Professional Disposition Rubric.  The rubric contains 8 elements based on the INTASC standards: 5 elements to be assessed: (1)Ability to share instructional responsibility for students with diverse need (2) Ability to develop collaborative teaching relationships and instructional strategies (3) The ability to design, adapt and deliver instruction to address each student’s diverse learning strengths and needs and create opportunities of students to demonstrate their learning in different ways (4) Ability to articulate and reflect on a personal philosophy and its relationship to teaching practice (5)Demonstrates commitment to on-going professional development. The rubrics score range from 1 to 4 where 4 is highest score. "]
["Performance Target: ","The benchmark assessment is based on the INTASC standards for educators. 80% of the submitted professional dispositions are expected to attain a mean score of level 3 \"Meets Expectations\"   based on observations by the instructor of the course. "]
["Results:","1 out 2 (50%) of the submitted professional disposition assignments scored 3-meet expectations or higher on the Ability to share instructional responsibility for students with diverse need element of the assignment. 1 out 2 (50%) of the submitted professional disposition assignments scored 3-meet expectations or higher on the Ability to develop collaborative teaching relationships and instructional strategies element of the assignment. 1 out 2 (50%) of the submitted professional disposition assignments scored 3-meet expectations or higher on the ability to design, adapt and deliver instruction to address each student’s diverse learning strengths and needs and create opportunities of students to demonstrate their learning in different ways element of the assignment. 1 out 2 (50%) of the submitted professional disposition assignments scored 3-meet expectations or higher on the Ability to articulate and reflect on a personal philosophy and its relationship to teaching practice element of the assignment. 1 out 2 (50%) of the submitted professional disposition assignments scored 3-meet expectations or higher on theDemonstrates commitment to on-going professional development element of the assignment."]
["Use of Results:","Elementary Education faculty will continue to monitor completer's dispostions to determine course related  changes if deemed necessary. This measure will be used on next year's plans because it is an important way of the demonstrating ongoing teacher effectiveness as part of the INTASC standards. "]
["Outcome 3: Assessment Measure 2"]
["Class:","ELE 509: Evaluation in Elementary School"]
["Course Mode:","Face-to-Face"]
["Assignment:","Philosophy of Teaching and Assessment Paper"]
["Evaluation Tool:","Philosophy of Teaching and Assement Rubric"]
["Performance Target: ","The benchmark assessment is based on the ability to display the disposition and belief of teaching and assessment. 80% of the Elementary Education completers are expected to attain a mean score of level 3 \"Meets Expectations\"  based on the Philosophy of Teaching and Assesment Rubric. "]
["Results:","There were no traditional Elemetary Education students enrolled in the course this past year.  "]
["Use of Results:","Elementary Education faculty will continue to monitor completer's dispostions to determine course related  changes if deemed necessary. This measure will be used on next year's plans because it is an important way of the demonstrating ongoing teacher effective of InTASC standards. "]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]

{"sheet":"POs","index":3,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,5],[6,0,6,5],[11,1,11,5],[10,1,10,5],[9,1,9,5],[8,1,8,5],[5,1,5,5],[4,1,4,5],[3,1,3,5],[2,1,2,5],[1,0,1,5],[7,0,7,5]]}
["Program Outcome 1"]
["Increase Enrollment of the Elementary Education Traditional Masters program"]
["Assessment Measure:","Enrollment Data "]
["Assessment Target:","Enrollment in the Traditional Masters program by 5 students in 2018-19. "]
["Assessment Results:","The elementary education programs did not meet the recruitment target of 5 new Traditional students. Please provide enrollment number for 2018-19. "]
["Use of Results:","Elementary Education faculty will actively recruit potential candidates. Recruitment efforts were ramped up and new recruitment strategies were implemented, including calling prosepctive students and recruiting from district teachers. The secondary education program will contine to improve on recruitment by implementing recruitment strategies (working with school districts, faculty attending additional recruitment events). "]
["Program Outcome 2"]
["To retain Elementary Education Traditional Masters candidates."]
["Assessment Measure:","Retention data"]
["Assessment Target:","At least 5 students will be retained in the Elementary Education Traditional Master’s program in 2018-19. What was the enrollment number in 2018-19?"]
["Assessment Results:","Four Traditional Masters candidates completed the was retained in the Elementary Education program in 2018-2019."]
["Use of Results:","Target not met.  Elementary Education faculty will actively recruit and retain potential candidates by providing academic advising session outside of the normal universities hours. "]

{"sheet":"List","index":4,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":3,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["Face-to-Face",null,"Yes"]
["Online",null,"No"]
["Off campus"]